@Article{PereiraKSAABBCHHJKKLNNPSTVVW:2021:AdToDi,
author = "Pereira, Laura and Kuiper, Jan J. and Selomane, Odirilwe and
Aguiar, Ana Paula Dutra de and Asrar, Ghassen R. and Bennett,
Elena M. and Biggs, Reinette and Calvin, Katherine and Hedden,
Steve and Hsu, Angel and Jabbour, Jason and King, Nicholas and
K{\"o}berle, Alexandre C. and Lucas, Paul and Nel, Jeanne and
Norstr{\"o}m, Albert V. and Peterson, Garry and Sitas, Nadia and
Trisos, Christopher and van Vuuren, Detlef P. and Vervoort, Joost
and Ward, James",
affiliation = "{Utrecht University} and {Stockholm University} and {Stellenbosch
University} and {Instituto Nacional de Pesquisas Espaciais (INPE)}
and {Universities Space Research Association} and {McGill
University} and {Stellenbosch University} and {University of
Maryland} and {University of Colorado} and {Yale-NUS College} and
{United Nations Environment Programme} and {North-West University}
and {Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro (UFRJ)} and {PBL
Netherlands Environmental Assessment Agency} and {Wageningen
University} and {Stockholm University} and {Stockholm University}
and {Stellenbosch University} and {University of Maryland} and
{Utrecht University} and {Utrecht University} and {University of
South Australia}",
title = "Advancing a toolkit of diverse futures approaches for global
environmental assessments",
journal = "Ecosystems and People",
year = "2021",
volume = "17",
number = "1",
pages = "191--204",
note = "{Pr{\^e}mio CAPES Elsevier 2023 - ODS 8: Trabalho decente e
crescimento econ{\^o}mico}",
keywords = "Global environmental assessments, scenarios, models, futures,
SDGs, SDG17 partnerships to achieve the Goal < UN sustainable
development goals.",
abstract = "Global Environmental Assessments (GEAs) are in a unique position
to influence environmental decision-making in the context of
sustainability challenges. To do this effectively, however, new
methods are needed to respond to the needs of decision-makers for
a more integrated, contextualized and goal-seeking evaluation of
different policies, geared for action from global to local. While
scenarios are an important tool for GEAs to link short-term
decisions and medium and long-term consequences, these current
information needs cannot be met only through deductive approaches
focused on the global level. In this paper, we argue that a more
diverse set of futures tools operating at multiple scales are
needed to improve GEA scenario development and analysis to meet
the information needs of policymakers and other stakeholders
better. Based on the literature, we highlight four challenges that
GEAs need to be able to address in order to contribute to global
environmental decision-making about the future: 1. anticipate
unpredictable future conditions; 2. be relevant at multiple
scales, 3. include diverse actors, perspectives and contexts; and
4. leverage the imagination to inspire action. We present a
toolbox of future-oriented approaches and methods that can be used
to effectively address the four challenges currently faced by
GEAs.",
doi = "10.1080/26395916.2021.1901783",
url = "http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/26395916.2021.1901783",
issn = "2639-5908",
language = "en",
targetfile = "pereira_advancing.pdf",
urlaccessdate = "20 maio 2024"
}